The Professional Standards Authority (PSA) has set out a decisive direction for 2026, signalling a move toward preventative, data‑driven approaches to regulation—with fitness to practise at the centre of that shift. In its forward look at the year ahead, the PSA outlines how its oversight role will evolve as the regulatory landscape faces unprecedented scrutiny from national inquiries, workforce pressures, and rising expectations of transparency and fairness.
Preventative regulation moves to the forefront
A standout theme for 2026 is the PSA’s commitment to “exploring preventative approaches to regulation using data and insights.” This marks a significant pivot from traditional, reactive fitness to practise oversight—where concerns are addressed only after harm or risk has materialised—toward a model that identifies and mitigates risks earlier in the system.
For fitness to practise, this shift means:
- greater emphasis on early warning indicators
- closer examination of systemic and organisational contributors to risk
- support for regulators to intervene before concerns escalate
- a stronger focus on learning, trend analysis, and cross‑regulator intelligence
The PSA’s system‑wide vantage point positions it to lead this transition, using its comparative oversight of all statutory regulators to identify patterns that individual bodies may not see in isolation.
Fitness to practise learning becomes a core output
The PSA confirms that its Learning Points from fitness to practise reviews, first consolidated into a single report in 2025, will continue as a key feature of its regulatory oversight in 2026. These reports distil recurring themes from fitness to practise decision‑making across regulators, highlighting both strengths and areas requiring improvement.
By embedding this learning into its annual programme, the PSA aims to:
- improve consistency in fitness to practise decision‑making
- support regulators to address recurring weaknesses
- promote fairness, proportionality, and transparency
- strengthen public protection through shared learning
This reinforces the PSA’s role not only as a reviewer of individual decisions but as a driver of system‑wide improvement.
New Standards will shape future fitness to practise expectations
The PSA plans to introduce new Standards for regulators and Accredited Registers in 2026, with clearer expectations around leadership, governance, and organisational culture. These areas are increasingly recognised as critical to the quality and fairness of fitness to practise processes.
The updated Standards are expected to influence:
- how regulators demonstrate cultural competence in fitness to practise
- the handling of discrimination, bias, and fairness concerns
- organisational learning from fitness to practise cases
- the maturity and transparency of regulatory decision‑making
This aligns with wider national scrutiny of healthcare regulation, including the Mann review on racism and antisemitism and the Thirlwall Inquiry into serious patient safety failures.
A year of inquiries will shape the PSA’s fitness to practise agenda
Several major investigations are due to report in 2026, including Ockenden, Amos, Thirlwall, and the Independent Review of Social Work Regulation. Each is expected to raise questions about how regulators identify risk, respond to concerns, and ensure accountability.
The PSA has signalled that it will engage closely with these findings, using them to inform its oversight of fitness to practise processes and its advocacy for reform.
A more proactive oversight role
Taken together, the PSA’s 2026 priorities point to a more proactive, intelligence‑led approach to fitness to practise regulation—one that seeks to prevent harm rather than simply respond to it. By combining data‑driven insights, strengthened Standards, and cross‑regulator learning, the PSA aims to reshape how fitness to practise risk is understood and managed across the sector.
As the regulatory environment faces increasing complexity and public scrutiny, the PSA’s shift toward prevention marks a significant evolution in its role—and a potentially transformative moment for fitness to practise regulation across the UK.
Disclaimer: The accuracy and information of news stories published on this website is accurate on the date of publishing. We endeavour to update stories if information change. You can contact us with change and update requests. Where possible, we will link to sources. Content on this website is for guidance purposes only. We cannot accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances.

Restoration Courses
Courses suitable for any health and social care practitioner who is considering making an application for restoration back onto the register.

Insight & Remediation
Courses that are suitable for any healthcare practitioner who is facing an investigation or hearing at work or before their regulatory body.

Probity, Ethics & Professionalism
Courses designed for those facing a complaint involving in part or in whole honesty, integrity and /or professionalism.

Recent Comments