The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) has introduced new acceptance criteria, offering clearer guidance on how concerns about pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and registered pharmacies are assessed.
The updated criteria, published alongside a detailed guidance document, set out which issues may be referred for a fitness‑to‑practise investigation and which may lead to inspection or enforcement action. The changes follow a year in which the GPhC received more than 7,500 concerns—the highest volume in the regulator’s history.
According to the GPhC, the revised approach is intended to strengthen patient safety, improve transparency, and reduce the number of concerns submitted that fall outside the organisation’s regulatory remit.
Supporting better understanding among the public and the profession
The new criteria aim to give the public and pharmacy professionals a clearer understanding of when the GPhC should be involved. They outline:
- the types of issues that genuinely raise questions about a registrant’s fitness to practise
- the standards expected of registered pharmacies and how to identify when those standards are not met
- the circumstances in which the regulator must intervene to protect patient safety or uphold public confidence
By clarifying these boundaries, the GPhC hopes to reduce inappropriate or misdirected concerns while ensuring that serious matters continue to be escalated promptly and consistently.
Dionne Spence, Chief Enforcement Officer at the General Pharmaceutical Council, said:
“These updated criteria provide more clarity about which concerns fall within our remit, improving transparency and strengthening our risk-based approach.
“By improving understanding of when we need to be involved and when we don’t, we expect to reduce avoidable concerns and focus our regulatory effort where it makes the greatest difference to patient safety and public trust.
“We have also made our webpage on reporting concerns easier to understand, so anyone with a concern can direct it to the right place where it can be dealt with as effectively as possible.”
Disclaimer: The accuracy and information of news stories published on this website is accurate on the date of publishing. We endeavour to update stories if information change. You can contact us with change and update requests. Where possible, we will link to sources. Content on this website is for guidance purposes only. We cannot accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances.

Restoration Courses
Courses suitable for any health and social care practitioner who is considering making an application for restoration back onto the register.

Insight & Remediation
Courses that are suitable for any healthcare practitioner who is facing an investigation or hearing at work or before their regulatory body.

Probity, Ethics & Professionalism
Courses designed for those facing a complaint involving in part or in whole honesty, integrity and /or professionalism.

Recent Comments