The General Osteopathic Council (GOsC) has launched a public consultation proposing amendments to the Osteopaths Act 1993 aimed at strengthening legal protections surrounding the title ‘osteopath’. The move comes amid growing concerns over unregistered individuals using closely associated terminology—such as ‘osteopathic techniques’ or ‘osteopathic manipulation’—which may mislead the public into believing these individuals are registered osteopaths.

The GOsC reports a marked increase in non-registrants marketing services with language that closely mimics the regulated term “osteopath.” This trend poses potential risks to patient safety and undermines both public confidence and the reputation of the profession.

Under the existing Act, only the term “osteopath” is legally protected. While it is an offence to falsely claim this title, the use of derivative phrases isn’t clearly covered, meaning the GOsC cannot currently act against misleading promotional material unless the exact title is used.

Legal advice has confirmed that the current legislative wording is insufficient to address this growing issue.

What the Consultation Seeks

The GOsC is inviting feedback on:

  • Support for amending Section 32(1) of the Osteopaths Act.
  • Suggestions on additional terms that should be legally protected.
  • Awareness of the misuse of these terms.
  • Evidence supporting the case for legislative change.
UK Fitness to Practise News

Matthew Redford, GOsC’s Chief Executive and Registrar said:

‘Protecting the public through upholding the reputation of the profession is extremely important to the GOsC, which is why we do not believe it is right that unregulated professionals can align themselves with the highly valued title of osteopath. The consultation we are running seeks to strengthen protection of title so that we can take proportionate actions to address concerns raised with us.

Changing legislation will need approval from the Department of Health and Social Care and this is where input from key partners can help highlight the backing from the profession on this issue.’

We are seeking feedback from osteopaths, patients and key partner organisations across the profession, and anyone with an interest in this issue. Those responding will be able to share their views, and let us know whether they agree with our proposed changes, as well as helping to clarify the extent of the issue.

The consultation is open until Thursday, 9 October 2025 and welcomes views from osteopaths, patients, regulatory partners, and other interested stakeholders.

Disclaimer: The accuracy and information of news stories published on this website is accurate on the date of publishing. We endeavour to update stories if information change. You can contact us with change and update requests. Where possible, we will link to sources. Content on this website is for guidance purposes only. We cannot accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances.

Insight Works Training

Restoration Courses

Courses suitable for any health and social care practitioner who is considering making an application for restoration back onto the register.

Insight Works Training

Insight & Remediation

Courses that are suitable for any healthcare practitioner who is facing an investigation or hearing at work or before their regulatory body.

Insight Works Training

Probity, Ethics & Professionalism

Courses designed for those facing a complaint involving in part or in whole honesty, integrity and /or professionalism.