GOC publishes new statement on verification of contact lens specifications

The General Optical Council (GOC) has published a new statement on the verification of contact lens specifications, following a consultation. The statement sets out the GOC’s position that it does not intend to pursue sellers who do not comply with contact lens specification verification requirements in relation to copies, so long as specific conditions are met.

Section 27 of the Opticians Act 1989 (‘the Act’) specifies that in order to be supplied with prescription contact lenses, an individual must have an in-date contact lens specification which has been issued following a contact lens fitting. Where the original specification is not provided, and the sale is being made under the general direction of a GOC registrant or registered medical practitioner, the Act requires a copy of the specification to be verified with the person who provided it originally.

The GOC’s new position statement says that it does not “consider that there is sufficient evidence of risk of harm to the public, or a wider public interest, in prosecuting sellers who do not verify a copy of a contact lens specification provided that the copy of the specification is in-date (i.e. has not passed its expiry date); clear; does not contain any obvious errors; and has not obviously been tampered with.”

Steve Brooker, GOC Director of Regulatory Strategy, said:

“We would like to thank everyone who took the time to respond to our consultation on the verification of contact lens specifications and definition of aftercare statement. We hope the new statement clarifies our position in relation to what we consider to be an outdated requirement for copies of contact lens specifications, and lessens the inconvenience that original prescribers sometimes face when they have to verify copy specifications, creating delays that are passed on to patients as costs.

Opinion was more divided on our definition of aftercare, with professional bodies informing us that they already had detailed guidance on this issue. After further consideration, we determined that we could rely on our Standards of Practice for Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians and potentially any other relevant guidance if any fitness to practise cases were to arise on this matter in the future.

None of the points raised in the consultation convinced us that the 2006 statement on sale and supply of optical appliances was still required or that there would be any unintended consequences if it was withdrawn, so this will be removed.”

GPhC head of education Damian Day, the “in-principle framework for international pharmacists” comes after sustained “pressure and demand” for places on the overseas pharmacists’ assessment programme (OSPAP) and a revision of the initial education and training standards for pharmacists.

The report said that the proposals will address “the current risk” that places on OSPAP courses cannot meet the demand from internationally trained pharmacists who wish to practise in Great Britain.

The papers suggested that the same proposed process will also be applied to pharmacy technicians who were trained overseas.

Source: C+D

Disclaimer: The accuracy and information of news stories published on this website is accurate on the date of publishing. We endeavour to update stories if information change. You can contact us with change and update requests. Where possible, we will link to sources. Content on this website is for guidance purposes only. We cannot accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any action taken, or not taken. You should seek the appropriate legal advice having regard to your own particular circumstances.